Tuesday, March 28, 2006

Trouble Around the Corner for the Real Estate Market?

Today, CNNMoney.com did an article called The Danger Years for Homeowners, which had some very interesting points to ponder.

According to Doug Duncan, the chief economist for the Mortgage Bankers Association, mortgage delinquencies have historically reached their highest points during the third and fourth years.

Here are some statistics that make the times ahead a little scary. According to the MBA:

- Half of all mortgages are three years old or less.

- 3 trillion in mortgages in 2002

- 4 trillion in 2003

- 3 trillion in 2004

Combine this with some of these other adjustable mortgage facts:

- Many were interest-only ARMS and the incredibly popular “pay-option ARM” loans which have negative amortization.

- In California, in Jan / Feb of 05’ 61% of mortgages where interest only…. This was only 2% in 2002 (Source: RealEstate Journal)

- Hybrid ARMS made up as much as 50% of all loans originated in 2004 / 2005. (this includes interest-only, two-steps, pay-options).

- In 2005 the median home new homebuyer only put down 2%.

- November of 2005, 70.9% of ALL mortgages in California were adjustable rate mortgages with a peak of 73.7% in May of 2005. (Dataquick)

- Use of Adjustable Rate Mortgages in 2002 was 28.9% in 2003 52.3% (Source: Dataquick)

- In 2006 there is approximately $330 billion in Adjustable Rate Mortgages are set to adjust.

- In 2007 approximately 1 trillion will adjust

Mortgages Rates at 40 Year Lows and Inverted Curves

On top of the increased use of adjustable rate mortgages, statistically the peak period for mortgage delinquencies, you also have the fact that we are coming off 40 year mortgage lows. Mortgage rates are increasing and short-term mortgage rates like Adjustable Mortgages are increasing even faster.

In 2003 the 1-Year T-Bill as approximately 1%, now we are close to 4.495%

Index + Margin = Interest Rate

This is a formula many people will become familiar with soon.

Index is the indicator used by the adjustable rate mortgage. This is the variable portion of the formula.
Margin is the spread of the mortgage bank, usually 2.25% - 6.5%.

Example Adjustable Rate Mortgage adjustments assuming a 3% margin.

1 Yr T-Bill = 4.495% + 3% = 7.495%
1 Yr. LIBOR = 5.152% + 3% = 8.152%
COFI = 3.347% + 3% = 6.347%
CODI = 3.837% + 3% = 6.837%
COSI = 3.460% + 3% = 6.460%

As you can see from this snap-shot, most adjustable rate mortgages will be equal to or higher than current 30 year fixed rate mortgages. For many homeowners, their mortgages will easily adjust the maximum capped 2% above the start rate.

The real issue to this is that not only is the mortgage rate going up, but you may also be going from an interest-only loan to a fully amortized loan and you are now financing the entire balance for a shorter term.

We have created some mortgage calculators to see the exact adjustments:

Pay Option ARM / Negative Amortization Mortgage Calculator
2 / 28 Adjustable Rate Mortgage Calculator
3 / 27 Adjustable Rate Mortgage Calculator
5 / 25 Adjustable Rate Mortgage Calculator

Doomsayers think that this may be the catalyst to the housing bubble… while optimist believe that the real estate market and consumers have enough strength and will escape unscathed.

One thing is certain, is that a significant increase in mortgage delinquencies, creates bank foreclosures and when there is enough bank foreclosures, this puts downward price pressures on all other properties. Homebuyers begin looking for deals in foreclosures and home sellers are competing directly against discounted foreclosure listings for the homebuyer’s attention.

Is the real estate market going to be affected? Only time will tell but we would like your thoughts and reason why or why not the real estate market will be affected?

Monday, March 13, 2006

Real Estate Commission Discussions... The Heated Debates Continue.

As seen from Inmans blog post which caused over 200 responses, there is some heated debates going on. Following up on this here are some other posts that are very interesting.

Are Real Estate Agents Overpaid?
Real Estate Commissions Under Pressure (NPR)
The 6% Solution
Antitrust versus Guilding: The Real Estate
Why real estate commissions will fall - Cnn Money
Commissions are crumbling... Businessweek

What are your thoughts... up / down / same?

Friday, March 10, 2006

Is Real Estate Finally Changing... Lively Blog Discussion at Inman

Here is a pretty lively real estate discussion on the Inman blog. The main question was if traditional real estate will change or will it stay the same... give them your two cents.

Thursday, March 09, 2006

National Association of REALTORS Pissed... NAR & REALTORS Fire Back at Author's Comments

Here is some interesting reading. The authors of "FreakEconomics" where on the Today show a while back and brought up some research from their book that basically stated, real estate agents who sell their own properties net a higher amount and stay on the market longer then the properties they list for their clients. This pissed off the NAR, so they fired back. Here is a link to the FreakEconomics blog response to the NAR's response.

Then just a few days ago, the FreakEconomics guys where at it again on the NYTimes with this article "Endangered Species"... here are some comments from the article posted on their blog.

This has spawned a good conversation at the RainCity blog.

What are your thoughts, are REALTORS really in trouble? Do they provide "professional services" or simply "convenient services"?

Monday, March 06, 2006

Why is the National Association of REALTORS Pending Home Sales Index Data of 2005 Revised Since The Last Release?

Today, the NAR released its PHSI figures and not surprisingly we are now at the fifth straight month of a cooling trend. What did surprise me was when I was going to update my Pending Home Sales Index charts, I noticed after reviewing the data that the historical figures reported from last year have been revised on this new chart reflecting Jan 2006?

I reviewed the NAR press release and there was no explanation of the revision and why the figures would be different? Take a look and compare:

Feb. 06 - Download the current PHSI release.
Jan. 05 – Download the previous PHSI release

When I have more time I will chart the difference for the two sets of data.

Anyone have any thoughts why all of the figures for last year would be revised as it would seem that data from 5 months ago should not need a revision now?